a conservative heretic commenting on hypocrisy and stupidity in a world with too much of both
If you found this post of interest, please share it with your friends.
We no longer accept advertising on this blog. Your donations help us to defray the costs of its operation and are much appreciated.
Stay informed

Follow the Bear - Subscribe today

Archives

Stephen Harper – Canada’s CEO

“This political party stands for values that are eternal … this country will either adopt our values or it will fail.”
Stephen Harper

 

I voted for Stephen Harper four times. The last time I voted for him, it was because I believed he was best suited to handle Canada’s economy during this period of economic uncertainty but the first time I voted for him it was because I believed that he had a vision for Canada that included preserving the rights and freedoms of all Canadians in all parts of the country.

I was wrong.

For all the rhetoric that gets trotted out at election time, this Prime Minister is about as disengaged from Canadians as it is possible to get without actually moving to another country. Don’t believe me? Ask yourself a question.

When was the last time Mr. Harper sat down in front of the cameras to speak directly to Canadians about a crisis, a scandal or even just a major national issue like health care or pipelines?

The answer is that he has never done it.

He didn’t speak directly to Canadians following his tour of the Alberta floods, didn’t speak directly to Canadians about the Senate expense scandal until he was cornered by the media at a press conference in South America and has never spoken directly to Canadians about any major issue outside of an election campaign.

I don’t count the carefully choreographed photo ops and announcements he makes at partisan events like his current northern tour – those are meaningless. They aren’t about engaging and uniting Canadians, they’re about ‘selling’ the Conservative Party message.

Even the much vaunted Economic Action Plan was unworthy of a direct discussion with Canadians. It has been promoted through unnecessary and overly expensive television ads for which you and I pay.

This is a Prime Minister who has refused to meet with the provincial premiers and then no doubt wonders why he has so much difficulty getting agreement on things like the Northern Gateway pipeline.

Stephen Harper is a world leader who can’t be bothered leading and speaking up for or to the people who elected him. He governs by dictate rather than consensus because he is less a political leader than he is Canada’s CEO.

Nowhere is that more evident than in his complete disregard for the rights of Canadian citizens that are being trampled in Quebec by the minority PQ government.

This past week, the Quebec Government signaled that it was preparing to proceed with legislation to ban the right of Canadian citizens living within the province to wear religious symbols of their faith. This would include things like turbans, kirpans, the hijab, crucifixes and stars of David. It is in direct violation of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Section II of the Charter states:

“Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;

It is also a violation of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights which states in Section III”

“Every person is the possessor of the fundamental freedoms, including freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, freedom of opinion, freedom of expression, freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association.”

This move to strip more rights from Canadian citizens living in Quebec is part of a continuing erosion of many rights including language and educational rights guaranteed under the Charter and yet, this Prime Minister has dismissed the entire issue as “a provincial matter.”  Apparently, defending the rights of Canadians citizens is beneath Canada’s CEO.

But it comes as no surprise considering Mr. Harper’s reluctance to trouble himself with issues that effect Canadians in various provinces. Nor is he alone in his reticence when addressing thorny issues like the rights of  Canadian minorities in various regions.

Thomas Mulcair, leader of the New Democratic Party has taken it his usual step further and simply stated that there is no issue unless there is a specific piece of legislation on the table. Isn’t that a convenient set of principles? It is no doubt predicated on the fact that fully half of Mr. Muclair’s MPs are from Quebec and he is reluctant to speak out on any issue that might threaten that support unless he is absolutely forced to do so.

Of course, it ignores the fact that language and educational rights have already been restricted but you can’t expect much in the way of principled leadership from a politician who can’t decide whether he is a citizen of Canada or of France and so clings to both.

What I find particularly troubling is that the only political leader to have shown leadership on this issue was Canada’s Peter Pan – Justin Trudeau.

That’s a bitter pill for me to swallow because I continue to believe that Mr. Trudeau, while probably a nice guy, is vain and quite vacuous when it comes to policy but he is connecting with Canadians in a way that neither Stephen Harper nor Thomas Mulcair have been able to achieve.

I believe it is because for all of his fumbling and bumbling around, for all of his shallow pop-star appearances and pronouncements, he actually cares about Canadians and their rights and well-being and Canadians understand that. I doubt he has the political smarts to actually do much about it but he is at least connected to the issues that trouble many Canadians. It is starting to appear that ‘engaging all Canadians” is more than just sloganeering for Mr. Trudeau and the smart money in the PC Party would do well to take note.

Unlike Stephen Harper, Justin Trudeau met with Pauline Marois on the issue of religious symbols and after that meeting spoke out against the Quebec Government’s position and in defense of fellow Canadians whose rights were under attack.

“It’s important the state and its institutions be neutral, but the freedom of expression, freedom of religion are freedoms that are accessible to all Canadians regardless of who they work for, -Justin Trudeau

Was it enough to accomplish anything? Probably not – the PQ Government is quite intransigent and bigoted but it was a damn sight more than either Mr. Harper or Mr. Mulcair were prepared to do.

Here’s a note to the smart kids in the Conservative war room.

The old attacks that worked on Stephen Dion and Michael Ignatieff aren’t going to work against Justin Trudeau. The more he is attacked, the more distant and removed from Canadians Stephen Harper will be made to appear.

And quite frankly, my friends, if as Prime Minister he is unwilling to speak out in defense of the rights of Canadian Citizens in Quebec or anywhere in Canada, the last thing he needs is to be made to appear even less connected.

I am well aware that many of my Conservative friends will dispute this opinion. To them I say this. Conservatives are supposed to be the party of the individual, the party prepared to defend individual rights and freedoms of all citizens. It’s what we claim to believe. Our leader, the guy we voted for isn’t doing that. He dismisses the restricting of the rights of Canadians as a provincial matter with the same disdain as Pontius Pilate washing his hands before Christ.

Surely to God, as Conservatives, we stand for more than just balancing the books!

Canada is more than just an economy. It is the sum total of its people and it is defined by the rights and freedoms to which every single Canadian is entitled; even the ones that make us feel uncomfortable. If its political leadership is not prepared to defend those rights and freedoms with at the very least, the same vigour it brings to managing the economy, it is failed leadership.

Conservatives talk about freedom but support a government that refuses to speak out against the restriction of rights of some Canadians — rights they take for granted in other parts of the country. They would do well to remember that if the rights of some can be restricted, the rights of all are just as easy to suppress.

“…freedom is not an end in itself,  how freedom is exercised matters as much as freedom itself,” -Stephen Harper

If part of being a free people doesn’t include defending the rights and freedoms of all, what value does freedom actually hold? There was a time when Stephen Harper understood that but then, that was before he traded being Prime Minister to become Canada’s CEO.

————————————————————————————————————-

© 2013 Maggie’s Bear

all rights reserved The written content of this article is the sole property of Maggie’s Bear but a link to it may be shared by those who think it may be of interest to others

Let’s connect on Twitter: @maggsbear or send  a  friend request on Facebook to: Maggie’s Bear

————————————————————————————————————-

  • Pingback: A Bear’s Rant | Grumpy Opinions()

  • Bert_1

    As per usual, I agree and I disagree :-)

    On the topic of Harper’s openness, I have to say that If I were him, I would be doing exactly what he is doing. The media is contemptible anymore so why should he or anyone else lower themselves to talk to those people? I read blogs like yours because I am interested in both the truth and people’s opinions about the truth. I am NOT interested in having someone telling me how or what to think or their version of the truth. That leaves organizations like CBC out as far as finding facts about anything. I do believe that Harper needs to communicate better but I am at a loss as to how he should do that. He has a fairly active Twitter feed but Twitter isn’t the best medium to disseminate large amounts of information.

    On the topic of what Quebec is doing, I have – I can’t believe that I am saying this – to agree with Mulcair. Any government in Canada can rattle their sabers until the cows come home and there is nothing that anyone can do about it. It isn’t until a law is actually passed that it can be challenged. Yes, Harper should let Quebec know what he thinks of the proposed legislation but, you and I both know that he would be crucified as a micromanager if he does. I think that he should wait to see what Quebec does and come down on them like the proverbial brick outhouse if they pass anything that does violate the constitution.

    • MaggiesBear

      I agree with you about the media but I didn’t suggest he talk to Canadians through the media which he often does already. I asked why he doesn’t buy time to speak directly to Canadians and cut out the middle man. Pierre Trudeau, Brian Mulroney, Joe Clark, Jean Chretien and Paul Martin all did it but not this Prime Minister. He doesn’t speak directly to Canadians unless he’s selling something and he doesn’t speak with the provinces unless he has too.

      As for the Quebec issue, I disagree. There has been a long tradition in this country of letting successive governments in Quebec erode the rights of linguistic, cultural and religious minorities. It is a violation of the rights and freedoms that are guaranteed to all Canadians. If our Prime Minister isn’t going to stand up and defend those rights, who is?

      We’re conservatives. Defending the rights of fellow citizens is supposed to be one of our core values and suggesting we wait until after the fact to speak up seems somewhat lame to me.

      • Bert_1

        I guess we need something like the American’s Rose Garden where the PM can hold press conferences. But, yes, I agree, he should do something to let us know what he is thinking. I would hate to see Trudeau win because he is more charismatic than Harper.

        On the Quebec issue, I agree whole heartedly that we should defend personal right and freedoms vigorously. However, and this may be because I don’t understand law well, it is perfectly legal to pass an illegal law in most democracies. If Quebec wants to make all religions illegal, they can do that. A law like that can be successfully challenged and thrown out, but they *can* pass it.

        Yes, we should let our feelings be known to all in cases like this. But, Canadians typically don’t. I was thinking of this very thing the other day while reading about the protests and work that is being done in the US against abortion. What is being done in Canada? Even from the basest position, that our health care dollars are being used to pay for elective surgery, few are standing up against the practice and to be heard. We just tend to roll over and let the government do whatever they want. Look at Ontario: They have been raped by the current government yet in the last round of by-elections, two more liberals were elected. WTF??? What do you have to do to get the boot as a politician or political party in Canada? Canada was raped by PET yet there are still many who absolutely swoon at the mere mention of his name.

        • MaggiesBear

          I think all that’s needed is a camera crew. There is a Parliamentary Press Building right across the street from the House of Commons that has all the necessary facilities for a ‘fireside’ chat.

          It isn’t just Liberals that we let run over us. The abortion issue has been stymied by this Conservative PM. Accountability is a joke. He created the Parliamentary Budget Office and then spent years fighting it in and out of court, initially defended the corruption in the Senate until it reached into his own office and could no longer be defended and is as ultra partisan as any PM left or right in Canadian history.

          We need a leader, not a CEO; a person who believes in Canadians as a people, not Canada as an enterprise to be managed. It is precisely because Canadians want a leader to whom they can relate that Justin Trudeau’s popularity is continuing to increase. Stephen Harper has proven that he doesn’t relate to Canadians very well.

          • Evil Genius

            I think you’ve done a good job of making your argument… but I also think Harper’s arrogance is going to catch up with him: “I’m a little bit disappointed that you would ask the question.”
            The problem is that he is “oldschool.” Don’t get me wrong, he can still make a huge contribution to the PC cause… but more successfully if he adopts a role that is similar to that of Hilary Clinton.

            • MaggiesBear

              Stephen Harper is no more old school than my dog. I used his quote about values purposely. He has deviated from his own professed values and that begs the question, if we as conservatives believe that our values are based on a set of principles, why do we continue to defend and support someone who ignores those principles?

              • Evil Genius

                I think it’s a case of choosing the best of the worst. Perhaps it points out what we already know; democracy isn’t really working anymore. – If members of the conservative caucus are seeking re-election… you think they’d be pushing for a new leader. ( right now there’s a pretty good chance they’ll be out of a job.)

  • Pingback: Conservatives, read this | Brigitte Pellerin Online()